noting if there are any missing links in the story and if certain points are under- or overrepresented. Second, I pay attention to the results and whether rubber tree thesis they have been compared with other similar published studies. The parts of the Discussion I focus on most are context and whether the authors make claims that overreach the data. Overall, I try to make comments that would make the paper stronger. . I may, for example, highlight an obvious typo or grammatical error, though I dont pay a lot of attention to these, as it is the authors and copyeditors responsibility to ensure clear writing. I generally read on the computer and start with the Abstract to get an initial impression.
Open Access, differences of Neglect in Peripersonal Space and Extrapersonal Space in a Patient with Unilateral Spatial Neglect. Do the results answer the specific question(S)? What do you think they mean? Keep in mind that not every paper will test a null hypothesis. While I encourage you to go read the comments and contribute your own, here I want to focus on the much larger issue that this debate raised: what constitutes scientific authority? As you read, write down every single word that you dont understand. Last weeks post the truth about vaccinations: Your physician knows more than the University of Google ) sparked a very lively discussion, with comments from several people trying to persuade me (and the other readers) that their paper disproved everything that Id been saying.
This varies widely, from a few minutes if there is clearly a major problem with the paper to half a day if the paper is really interesting but there are aspects that I don't understand. Before submitting a review, I ask myself whether I would be comfortable if my identity as a reviewer was known to the authors. If you make a practice of signing reviews, then over the years, many of your colleagues will have received reviews with your name on them. Also, the journal has invited you to review an article based on your expertise, but there will be many things you dont know. (Im not going to say much more about them here, but be cautious about which review articles you read. Impact Factor:.023, provided by sjif, iSSN International Journal of Scientific Technology Research. Be patient with yourself.